Main Menu
2021 BEYOND THE PLAIN FACTS: FORENSIC EVALUATIONS FOR IDENTIFYING AND ESTABLISHING NRS 125. C BEST INTERESTS FACTORS (J, FJ, SJ)

Recorded February 19, 2021

Training Description:

Dr. Stephanie Holland and Judge Margaret Pickard discuss the effective use of Comprehensive Custody Evaluations and Brief Focused Assessments in child custody cases. While these two forensic tools have underlying similarities, their practical applications are starkly different. Both CCEs and BFAs are used to assist in better informing judicial decision-making in child custody disputes, and both evaluations may be appropriate in different phases of the same case. However, BFAs typically address specific issues in a family dispute while CCEs offer a comprehensive analysis of the internal family dynamic and the parenting capacity of each parent. Participants will learn how the differences of the two assessments can assist the court. Practical considerations for rural areas will be considered, including how rural areas can implement the use of evaluations and some of the obstacles that Courts face in rural areas.

Faculty:

Stephanie Holland, Psy.D., Ltd. dba Desert Psychological, NV and Judge Margaret Pickard, Eighth Judicial District Court

Who Should Attend:

This course is designed for all Nevada judges and masters. NOTE: Meets Core Competency “Judicial Skills” (JS).

Continuing Education Credit:

1.0 CLE/CJE (Certificate of Attendance required to receive continuing legal/judicial education credit). NOTE: CLE credit for this course is approved through February 19, 2024, and will then be stale dated.

Register:

This video requires access to the Distance Education Program’s (DEP) secure password-protected website for use by current Nevada judicial officers and court personnel (e.g. active judges, quasi-judicial officers, court employees, and retired judges). Returning DEP users, click here. If you are a new user, click This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

These resources do not necessarily reflect the views of the Supreme Court of Nevada, the Administrative Office of the Courts, or Judicial Education nor provide any warranties as to the currency and accuracy of the information in these works. Users are reminded to check the subsequent changes to rules of court and statutes cited in the works before relying on them. Questions regarding a specific education session should be directed to the faculty of that session.